Monday, April 20, 2020

SEM II (ENG HONS)A critical appreciation of Kubla Khan

2nd SEM English Honours,
CEH 4 British Romantic Literature

A critical appreciation of Kubla Khan:
              Kubla Khan: or A Vision in a Dream: A Fragment is a poem written by Samuel Taylor Coleridge published in  1816.    Modern critics view Kublan Khan as one of the three great works of Coleridge including Rime of the Ancient Mariner and Christable. It is one og the most famous example of Romanticism in English poetry. The poet himself in his preface to the Kubla Khan comments that “ if that indeed can be called composition in which all the images rose up before him as things, with a parallel production of correspondent expressions without any expressions with any sensation or conscious effort.”
According to Coleridge’s preface to Kubla Khan, the poem was composed one night after he experienced an opium-influenced dream after reading a work describing Xanadu, the summer palace of the Mongol ruler Kubla Khan. Upon waking, he set about writing lines of poetry that came to him from the dream unti he was interrupted by a person from Porlock. The story of poem’s composition, while thematically rich in and itself, often overshadows the poem, but with Coleridge’s mastery over expression and images infused, the poem shines out.
The major themes of the poem are creative power of imagination, man and the natural world, and time. The “pleasure-dome in air” is an instance of power of imagination. The interaction between man and nature is all over “Kubla Khan” as we go from the dome to the river and then from the garden to sea. Time is another important theme which raises the question: Is Coleridge recalling the Kubla Khan of the past, or someone who transcends our linear notion of time?.
 The chant like musical incantation of Kubla Khan results from Coleridge’s use of iambic tetrameter and alternating rhyme schemes of ABAABCCDEDE. There is variation of rhyming schemes in each stanza.The first three stanzas are product of pure imagination: the pleasure-dome in the poem is a metaphor for the unbuilt monument of imagination. After the second stanza the meter suddenly tightens: the resulting lines are terse and solid, almost beating out sound of the war drums,
The shadow of the dome of pleasure
Floated midway on the waves
The fourth stanza starts the theme of the poem as a whole though the poem exists only as a fragment. The speaker says that he once had a vision of the damsel singing of Mount Abora. He insists that if he could only “revive” within him “her symphony and song”, he would manifest itself in his “flashing eyes” and “floating hair”. But, awestruck, they would nonetheless dutifully take part in the ritual recognising that “he on honey-dew hath fed,/ And drunk the milk of Paradise.”

The pleasure-dome , the river Alph, mighty fountain, mazy motion, tumult, ancestral voices and mingled measure are the major symbols in the poem. The pleasure dome symbolises immortality and majesty, the river Alph is a symbol of life and force. The ceaseless turmoil of the earth, the fountain forced out with half intermitten burst, the fragments rebounding like hail and the dancing rocks represent agony and power. The mazy motion suggests uncertain and blind progress of the human soul and the complexities of human life. The tumult is associated with war, the ancestral voices stand for that dark compulsion that bind the race to its habitual conflicts. The mingled measure suggests the blend of fundamental opposities, creation and destruction.

 Kubla Khan achieves its effect because of its high degree of meaningful integration, an integration which may, following Coleridge's description of the ideal poet, "bring the whole soul of man into activity."' But the widening concept of the imagination is most significant for the poem's interpretation. If the poem is viewed as imaging the creative imagination, foreshadowed by 18th century influences and in all its Coleridgean implications-the activity of genius, fullness of life, its religious tone, its passive as well as its active character-the poem's so-called fragmentariness ceases to be worthy of discussion and its prosodical perfection becomes